Browsing All Posts filed under »Psychology«

Which conferences to attend?

January 22, 2012


This is a question I always ask myself at the beginning of every year. With a few years of experience behind me I think I am in something of a position to make a judgement as to which of the many conferences that take place every year are the most likely to be valuable to […]

Beyond Disbelief: preliminary report

September 24, 2010


Not long ago I placed on this blog information about a web survey of nonbelievers that was carried out by a couple of academics from the University of Waterloo. The results are now in and Cheyne and Britton have produced a preliminary report that makes for interesting reading. I quote just the final paragraph as […]

Survey of Unbelievers

August 25, 2010


Fred Britton, who works in the psychology department at the University of Waterloo has contacted me and asked that I put up the following information regarding an on-line study that is looking for participants and, in particular, agnostic participants: Dr. Allan Cheyne (Psychology Dept., University of Waterloo) and I are conducting a web survey of […]

Diets and deities

August 4, 2010


While working on the book I was struck by what feels like an enlightening comparison between what we eat and what we believe. People’s diets are usually determined by three different kinds of considerations. The first is purely physiological – certain substances are necessary for the proper functioning of human bodies while others are toxic. […]

Is postdecisional dissonance functional?

July 25, 2010


Last semester I taught Judgement and Decision Making using the Scott Plous book The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. I found the book quite frustrating in that it followed the “rhetoric of irrationality” that is currently favoured within JDM right up to the last chapter where it took a more critical view of this […]

Dual system theories demolished

July 14, 2010


The most thorough critique that one can offer for any particular position should, it seems to me, contain two elements. The first should be the standard argument showing why it is that the position under attack is fallacious. The second, but often forgotten, element is an explanation for why it is that some people, often […]

Language as social coordination

May 11, 2010


A colleague of mine at Warsaw University is organising an international conference on language that is going to include a number of people that are well known to me, including a number of past key-speakers from various Kazimierz Workshops. The conference emphasizes the biological nature of language, underscoring its coordinative function. The aim of the […]